Three men, a physican, a engineer and a computer scientist, are travelling in a car. Suddenly, the car starts to smoke and stops.The three atonished men try to solve the problem:
- Physican says: This is obviously a classic problem of torque.It has been overloaded the elasticity limit of the main axis.
- Engineer says : Let’s be serious! The matter is that it has been burned the spark of the connecting rod to the dynamo of the radiator. I can easily repair it by hammering.
- Computer scientist says : What if we get off the car, wait a minute, and then get in and try again?
laotuinbay 于
2013-05-20 10:01 下午
看来一楼yannan写程序尚需努力。对的看错了,错的也会看对。这就是为什么,写程序,要守coding guideline or coding style.
第二页有错误,程序抄错了吧,两个return中间应该有else
如果你把文中提到的概念真搞懂了,你就是大拿了,就明白为什么数学家是beautiful mind。
现实中的计算机科学家和软件工程师们都是机会主义者。
Three men, a physican, a engineer and a computer scientist, are travelling in a car. Suddenly, the car starts to smoke and stops.The three atonished men try to solve the problem:
- Physican says: This is obviously a classic problem of torque.It has been overloaded the elasticity limit of the main axis.
- Engineer says : Let’s be serious! The matter is that it has been burned the spark of the connecting rod to the dynamo of the radiator. I can easily repair it by hammering.
- Computer scientist says : What if we get off the car, wait a minute, and then get in and try again?
看来一楼yannan写程序尚需努力。对的看错了,错的也会看对。这就是为什么,写程序,要守coding guideline or coding style.
第二页有错误,程序抄错了吧,两个return中间应该有else
—————————
不需要else,一个函数只能return一次,哈哈
被绕晕了,高手都是自虐型的。只能是博大精深,深到让人怀疑,是不是真的有上帝。
这文章应该命名为程序员装逼指南
请教一个问题:
第15页
G(n): UnPr( N(n) )。G(n) 即 UnPr( N(n) ),是一个含参数 n 的字符串。
有自然数 g 令N(g) = G(n).
将g带入n,得到
G(g): UnPr( N(g) )
也就是
G(g): UnPr( G(n) )
接下去如何推导出
G(g): UnPr( G(g) )
从而完成哥德尔的构造?
当初看到刘未鹏的《暗时间》的时候只是觉得虽然看不懂,但是好像很牛B的样子
后来看《the little schemer》里面关于lambda算子的构造过程,感觉似乎明白了一点点,但是还是不懂还是觉得很牛B的样子
确实是程序员装B利器。
代码应该直接用scheme 来写,不然感觉乱乱的。
to 2楼:
it is a great joke!
想研究函数式语言,找 王珢。
开头一大段怎么像”Functional Programming For The Rest of Us”
最后推荐的GEB是一本好书,译名《集异璧之大成》就是神来一笔。